What You Should Know About the Competitors
Instead of starting with a conventional business definition,
such as a product or the output from different parts of your
organization, thinking about competitive segments lobs you straight
at the most important way to split and think about your business.
At the instrumentation company referred to earlier, managers
just could not agree among themselves how to analyze the business.
Some thought that products were the key dimension. The view
of others was that the most important split was whether the
customers were in the pipeline business or in continuous process
industries (such as food manufacturers).
A third faction held that the US business was very different
from the export business. Since they started from different
assumptions, all of which were to some degree valid, it was
very difficult to make progress either in organizing the business
or in communicating with each other. Dividing the business into
competitive segments demolished these arguments. The rule is
simple: if you don’t face different competitors, or different
relative competitive positions, it’s not a separate segment.
We quickly arrived at a rather inelegant, but very clear, set
of segments that everyone could understand. For a start, it
was clear that the competitors were very different in most,
but not all, products. Where the competitors were the same,
with similar relative competitive positions, we lumped the products
together. In most other cases we kept the products apart. Then
we asked whether the competitive positions were different for
pipeline customers as distinct from process customers. In all
but one product, the answer was no. But in that one product,
liquid density machines, the largest competitors were different.
We therefore settled for two segments here: liquid density pipeline
and liquid density process.
Finally, we asked whether the competitors or competitive positions
were different in each segment in the US and in international
business. In most cases the answer was yes. If the international
business was significant enough, we asked the same question
for different countries: was it the same competitor in the UK
as in France or Asia? Where the competitors were different,
we subdivided the business into separate segments. We ended
up with a patchwork quilt of 15 large segments usually defined
by product and geographic region, but in one case by product
and customer type (this was liquid density, where the segments
were liquid density pipeline worldwide and liquid density process
worldwide). Each segment had a different competitor or different
competitive positions.